LTL Managing Partner David Ammons has joined the Board of Directors of the California Minority Counsel Program (“CMCP”). Since 1989, CMCP has been dedicated to eliminating the disparity between the percentage of minorities in California’s population and the legal profession. Through its many programs, CMCP has given minority attorneys direct access to corporate decision-makers, assisted corporations and law firms in meeting their commitments to increasing the number of diverse attorneys in their ranks, and assisting public and private entities in increasing their minority outside spend. “LTL Attorneys has been a proud sponsor of many CMCP programs over the years, and I look forward to this leadership role in ensuring that the legal profession accurately reflects the diverse state that it serves.”
On June 7, LTL welcomed its newest associate Colin Ravelle to its ranks. Colin is a 2019 Berkeley grad, and joins LTL from Kaufman Dolowich Voluck LLP where his practice focused on real estate litigation, representing Homeowners’ Associations, property owners, landlords, and real estate brokers/agents in real property and contract matters including purchase and sale agreements, construction defects, non-disclosure, partitions, unlawful detainer, and mobile home law. At Berkeley, Colin was a member of the editorial board for the Berkeley Technology Law Journal, and graduated with a specialization certification in Technology Law.
On June 24, 2020, the Los Angeles Superior Court dismissed an employment discrimination and retaliation suit brought by a former employee of LTL client EMPTECH. The suit alleged that following nearly a decade of exceptional performance, Plaintiff, the former Director of Operations, was demoted and ultimately fired for accommodating a subordinate employee’s disability and for championing the employee’s right to accommodation. Plaintiff claimed that when Emptech’s Chief Executive Officer learned about the accommodation, he became hostile towards both employees. Plaintiff further alleged that the CEO subsequently reprimanded, suspended and terminated the subordinate employee, and when Plaintiff protested these actions as purportedly illegal, she too was demoted and then fired within a few months of her complaints.
Although it was discovered during the litigation that Plaintiff was having an extra-marital affair with the subordinate employee for several years, that the two stole the company’s trade secrets and attempted to steal the company’s clients by starting a competing business, the Company did not assert such as a basis for Plaintiff’s separation. Rather, it was the CEO’s loss of confidence in Plaintiff’s ability to steer the company as second-in-command after receiving several complaints about her lack of guidance and productivity, a client’s dissatisfaction with her handling of its account, and Plaintiff’s sudden and unexcused absence from a critical meeting with a potential client that justified her dismissal.
LTL filed a motion for summary judgment arguing that the case should be dismissed without trial because Plaintiff could not establish that her termination was motivated by anything other than her performance. In granting the motion, the Court observed that an employee cannot simply show the employer’s decision was wrong, mistaken or unwise and, in this case, Plaintiff’s evidence failed to show the employer’s reasoning was implausible or incredible.
“We are pleased that the Court was able to carefully consider our arguments that Plaintiff’s separation from the Company was based on nothing more than her performance,” said LTL’s Managing Partner David Ammons, Emptech’s lead counsel. “We could not be more excited for EMPTECH, a small business which has had to endure this litigation for more than two years.”
Associates Julia Levitskaia and Michael Pearlson assisted in the Company’s defense.
On November 4, 2019, LTL attained dismissal on behalf of client TP-Link USA Corporation in a putative class action involving alleged false advertising related to Wi-Fi networking speed claims. The case involved two rounds of motion practice. In the initial round, Judge Richard Seeborg granted TP-Link’s motion to dismiss forcing Plaintiffs to amend their complaint to drastically narrow the scope of the putative class, as well as add three additional plaintiffs in an attempt to save their case. In the second round, LTL defeated this narrowed putative class as well. Although the Court granted leave to amend, Plaintiffs declined. Plaintiffs’ counsel are well-known class action attorneys.
The case was originally filed in August 2018 in the Superior Court of San Francisco. LTL successfully removed the case to federal court and proceeded to cut down the scope of Plaintiffs’ case through motion practice. We were also able to keep Plaintiffs’ discovery demands to a minimum until dismissal.
This decision is important for all types of consumer products. Essentially the Court found that if a manufacturer advertises according to industry practice, then no reasonable consumer would be misled or harmed unless very specific conditions are met. The Court’s ruling supports businesses’ ability to advertise following industry practices that make sense for the type of product at issue.
The case was handled by LTL partners Prashanth Chennakesavan and Heather Auyang, and associates David Crane and Blake Guererro. This result further highlights LTL’s successful expertise in defending clients against consumer class actions.
On August 19, 2019, the Second District Court of Appeal affirmed a judgment LTL obtained for client Gong Hua Xi. The Appellant had initiated a spousal property petition in the Los Angeles Superior Court Probate Department claiming that she became the putative spouse of the decedent four years prior to her legal marriage to him, and sought to use such status to claim community property ownership over real property the decedent held and purchased as separate property two years prior to their marriage. Representing the decedent’s biological family, LTL obtained a judgment following trial denying the petition on the ground that the Appellant had failed to meet her burden to demonstrate that she was the putative spouse at the time that the property was purchased. The Court of Appeal unanimously swept aside the Appellant’s arguments that the family lacked standing to object to her petition and that the trial court applied the incorrect legal standard. LTL Senior Counsel Alex Hu and Associate Blake Guerrero briefed and argued the appeal.
On June 25, 2019, LTL obtained summary judgment on behalf of client Walmart, Inc. from the Los Angeles Superior Court dismissing a former long-term employee’s suit claiming that he had been retaliated against after filing a worker’s compensation suit and complaining of harassment. The employee had worked at a Sam’s Club for nearly 13 years when he filed a 2016 worker’s compensation claim. However, he failed to report the workplace injury to his managers before filing the claim in contravention of a Club policy mandating that workplace injuries be reported to management immediately– his fourth policy violation in 10 months. When the employee’s managers received notice of the worker’s compensation filing, they questioned him as to why he had not reported the injury to anyone. At the end of the conversation, the former employee stated that his managers were always harassing him. Two days later, the employee was dismissed for excessive policy violations.
The former employee then brought suit alleging retaliation, disability discrimination and failure to accommodate his disability, seeking compensatory and punitive damages. Nearly two years after the suit was commenced, the Los Angeles Superior Court granted summary judgment to Walmart dismissing Plaintiff’s claims in their entirety and awarded Walmart the right to seek its costs. The suit was handled by LTL Managing Partner David Ammons and Associate Tiffany Hansen.
LTL is pleased to announce Paul Moskowitz has joined the firm as a partner in LTL’s San Francisco office.
In a career spanning nearly 30 years, Mr. Moskowitz has developed a specialty in directing complex commercial litigation, handling class action, securities, and False Claims Act cases, and guiding clients in regulatory compliance and other governmental investigations. He also spent five years as an in-house attorney at a financial services company, giving him a valuable perspective on commercial litigation from the client’s point of view.
“Paul’s experience directing complex commercial litigation—including high-stakes partnership disputes, class action matters, and government investigations—dovetails perfectly with our litigation philosophy,” said David Ammons, LTL’s Managing Partner. “Paul prepares cases with an eye towards trial, simplifying issues and highlighting themes for judges and juries alike,” Ammons continued.
Mr. Moskowitz completed his undergraduate and legal studies at the University of Virginia. After obtaining his J.D. in 1990, he began his legal career with Jones Day in Washington, D.C., and most recently worked for Bird Marella in Los Angeles.
LTL Attorneys LLP, a boutique, minority-owned law firm focused on complex litigation, has received a “Metropolitan Tier Three Ranking” in the category of Litigation – Intellectual Property in the San Francisco metropolitan area by the U.S. News Media Group and Best Lawyers®.
“It is an honor to be recognized on the Best Law Firms list — particularly as a top-tier firm in intellectual property litigation,” said David Ammons, LTL’s managing partner. “At LTL, we pride ourselves on offering our clients top-notch, quality litigation services, and this distinction is a credit to both our budding legal talent as well as our seasoned lawyers.”
Firms included in the “Best Law Firms” list are recognized for professional excellence with persistently impressive ratings from clients and peers. The list includes a collection of client and lawyer evaluations, peer review from leading attorneys in their fields and review of additional information provided by law firms as part of the formal submission process. The publication ranks more than 10,000 firms in 118 practice areas in 170 metropolitan areas and eight states annually.