LTL Attorneys Wins Motion to Compel Arbitration for client JP Morgan Chase
On May 23, 2023, the Superior Court granted LTL Attorneys' motion to compel arbitration in the case of Archuleta vs JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA.
On May 23, 2023, the Superior Court granted LTL Attorneys' motion to compel arbitration in the case of Archuleta vs JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA.
On February 9, 2023, the Alameda County Superior Court (Honorable James R. Reilly) granted summary judgment to LTL Attorneys’ clients the City of Oakland and the Oakland Police Department.
A Los Angeles County Superior Court jury rejected the sexual harassment and retaliation claims of a former employee of United Resources Information (“URI”) against the company and his former URI supervisor.
On June 22, 2021, the Second District Court of Appeal affirmed a judgment dismissing Appellant Mario Arce’s employment discrimination lawsuit against a global retailer represented by LTL.
On June 24, 2020, the Los Angeles Superior Court dismissed an employment discrimination and retaliation suit brought by a former employee of LTL client EMPTECH.
Effects of Newly Enacted COVID-19 Legislation upon Businesses and Employees.
On June 25, 2019, LTL obtained summary judgment on behalf of client Walmart, Inc. from the Los Angeles Superior Court.
On June 14, 2018, the Los Angeles Superior Court granted summary judgment in favor of LTL client TP-Link in a wrongful termination/retaliation suit.
LTL ATTORNEYS LLP (LTL) was named by corporate counsel as one of only 22 firms of the 650 law firms serving the Fortune 1000 as best at developing and delivering AFAs.
LTL has earned a coveted spot on the BTI 2016 Client Service A-Team List for recognition as a top performing leader in client service.